Rapid Insights: ‘Outlander: Blood of My Blood’ Proves Table-Stakes IP Opens the Door to Fresh Appeal

Starz recently debuted a compelling spin-off to its historical romance drama Outlander that’s so promising it’s already been renewed for a second season. This new show serves as a prequel to the original series, tracing how the parents of Outlander’s storied couple originally came together–one pair in 18th century Scotland, the other in WWI-era England.

Here’s what you need to know about Outlander: Blood of My Blood:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Is the same Outlander audience watching this new spin-off? 
Definitely. For Blood of My Blood, we’re seeing a viewership that skews heavily toward women (64%) and those 35+ (96%)–a near exact match for the original Outlander (65% women / 91% aged 35+). This audience profile fits much more closely with other romance-forward dramas like BridgertonWhen Calls the Heart, and Virgin River than period-piece sagas like Game of ThronesVikingsThe White Queen, or The Tudors, which tend to be more gender-balanced.

What is this new prequel carrying over from the original Outlander? 
An epic love story that crosses time. Blood of My Blood follows in its predecessor’s footsteps by transporting a disoriented English character from the mid-20th century into 18th-century Scotland through a formation of mystical standing stones (Time Travel, 129). Both shows then delve into the ins and outs of the complex Scottish clan dynamics of the period (Family Relationships, 129) while its lead characters fight against terrible odds to stay together (Falling in Love, 118). However, while Outlander tracks only one pair (Claire and Jamie), Blood of My Blood follows two–their parents: after producing Claire, a very-much-in-love married English couple must move heaven and earth to find each other again after passing through the stones, all while inadvertently helping Jamie’s Scottish parents to meet and fall in love for the first time. These basic bones of such a timeless story are top viewership drivers for both series.

What’s different from the original Outlander? 
The IP’s trappings are now table stakes. In addition to its core love story, Outlander’s popularity originally hinged on its fascinating depiction of a brutal era in Scottish history (British Culture, 121; Non-US Setting, 127) as well as its deliciously spicy (Sexual Activity, 114) adaptation of a blockbuster romance novel (Based on a Book, 114); all four of these key drivers were crucial to the show’s success, particularly its longevity. While these elements are equally present in Blood of My Blood, however, they no longer appear in the spin-off’s list of top drivers, suggesting pre-set viewer expectations. Fans already know the prequel will give them exactly what they want in terms of setting and sex, and so they’re no longer the draws they once were; audiences instead may be looking for Blood of My Blood to distinguish itself in a different way.

What’s helping to distinguish Blood of My Blood as its own show? 
Action and intensity. While Outlander’s first season offered up plenty of stressful violence to offset its sweet romance, the Scary Situations (130) in its prequel are more immediately prominent from the very first episode, driving both ratings and bingeability in a way they didn’t for the original series. Blood of My Blood opens on a period of warfare in two eras: the bombs and mustard gas of WWI and a bitter, bloody Rivalry (116) between Scottish clans in 1714. Larger scenes of Battle Action (121) as well as the everyday life-or-death dangers (Life in Danger, 121) inherent to the era–especially when one core couple comes from warring clans, Romeo and Juliet-style–is creating an especially tense emotional ride characterized by Vigilance (123)Anger (120)Terror (112), and Fear (111). The English couple’s desperate attempts to reunite in a strange land and era (A Missing Loved One, 117) add an original twist to the suspense as well; while Jamie’s Scottish family history is described in the Outlander novels, Claire’s parents’ story is new for the TV shows.

How is the new show’s social tracking? 
Stellar. Online activity for Blood of My Blood jumped to an “outstanding” level (peaking at 137) with its mid-July trailer drop, then rose again in the two weeks leading up to its early August premiere. The show ultimately maxed out our buzz meter (at 160) and now continues to hover near the top of the range. Outlander saw a parallel rise in chatter at the exact same time, likely spurred by fans comparing the established canon and characters of the original series to those in the new prequel.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Alien: Earth’ Exposes the Hidden Rule That Makes TV Horror Scarier Than Film

Last week, FX on Hulu premiered the first TV series in the Alien film franchise and it’s already racking up both critical and viewer acclaim. Set two years before the 1979 film Alien and fifteen years after 2012 prequel Prometheus, this new sci-fi horror-thriller follows what happens after a deep space research vessel, loaded with dangerous specimens, crash-lands on Earth.

Here’s what you need to know about Alien: Earth:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Who’s tuning in for this suspenseful new series? 
We’re seeing a viewership profile that’s heavily skewed toward men (59%) and those aged 35+ (85%). That’s roughly in line with horror-tinged sci-fi thriller series like 3 Body Problem, but significantly older and more gender-balanced than the theatrical audience who bought tickets for 2024’s Alien: Romulus (71% men / 46% aged 35+).

Why are viewers adding Alien: Earth to their queue? 
For its slow-burn tension and escalating dread. Rather than building toward one climactic showdown like the films, the series stretches horror across multiple episodes, layering Scary Situations (128)Psychological Turmoil (123), and life-or-death High Stakes (119) into a rolling drip-feed of fear, fueled by the intense horror sequences that have become synonymous with the film franchise. The trailer offers a tantalizing glimpse at the alien Dark Secrets (125) harbored within the crash-landed research vessel. Viewers are leaning into this episodic structure of Rage (123)Fear (118)Terror (115), and Surprise (115) to keep their hearts pounding and their curiosity stoked.

What’s making the show so addictingly bingeworthy? 
Futurism. Alien: Earth continues to expand on its franchise’s Distinctly Realized World (111), fleshing out the bleak situation on Earth in the 22nd century (IP Extension, 114). During the time Ripley is on the Nostromo, all of Earth is run by five all-powerful, out-of-control megacorporations pursuing avant-garde technologies and revolutionary Science (118) no matter the cost–including the first human-synthetic hybrid: a child’s consciousness in an android’s adult body. It’s these corporations’ rabid greed that ultimately unleashes the universe’s most dangerous organisms (Alien Lifeforms, 138)–including everyone’s favorite face-huggers–on an unsuspecting populace, with only a small team of armed androids (Military Operation, 116) sent to contain them. Audiences will want to keep watching to see how these futuristic storylines play out.

How does the show’s social buzz look? 
Out of this world. The early June trailer drop caused a sudden five-day spike in online activity around the series, maxing out our meter at (160). A second trailer in mid-July rekindled chatter, which jumped into the “outstanding” range, impressively hitting the top of our measuring stick (at 160) a full week before its premiere, where it has remained ever since. Online conversation is centered not only on the show’s nail-biting suspense but also on how it cleverly serializes the iconic Alien terror for a TV format.

What will help propel Alien: Earth into a second season? The clash between alien threats and human survival. Season one spotlights Earth’s terrifying first contact with deadly species and humanity’s struggle under megacorporate control. But TV horror thrives on escalation, and future seasons can raise the dread with new revelations, reversals, and fragile alliances. Themes of Survival Skills (120)Vengeance (118), and Idealism (113) give the series strong engines for longevity and sustained viewer engagement.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Chief of War’ Spotlights Why Authentic Worlds Drive Binge Appeal

Apple TV+ recently premiered an historical epic drama that’s receiving raves from critics and viewers alike and already has the makings of an instant smash hit. Created by and starring Jason Momoa, this new limited series traces the late 18th-century unification of the Hawaiian Islands from an indigenous perspective, and it’s being widely praised for its authenticity.

Here’s what you need to know about Chief of War:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Who’s been tuning in for this exciting new period saga? 
We’re seeing an audience that tips only slightly toward men (53%) and heavily toward those aged 35+ (82%)–a much more gender-balanced profile than similar male-led, action-heavy epics. Previous shows like VikingsVikings: ValhallaRome, The Last Kingdom, Spartacus, Shōgun, and Frontier have tended to skew much more markedly toward men (56-68% on streaming) because of their violence and scenes of war. Chief of War may be bringing in more women thanks to its focus on tightknit community bonds within the Hawai‘ian kingdoms and a number of strong female secondary characters.

Why are viewers checking out this show? 
For its intensity and suspense. Chief of War follows reluctant warrior chief Kaʻiana (Jason Momoa) as he forges a brutal campaign to unite the warring kingdoms of Hawai‘i, Kaua‘i, Maui, and O‘ahu against an onslaught of invading white European colonizers. Though at heart a man of peace, Kaʻiana nevertheless steps up in his people’s time of need (Heroism, 118), putting his own Life in Danger (134) over and over to save the many, even as he longs to return to his tranquil family life (Lifestyle Change, 128). To accomplish his aims, the hero must carefully navigate rival factions, bloody power struggles, complicated inter-kingdom politics, life-or-death Scary Situations (160), and plenty of spears-vs-muskets Battle Action (141), all of which amp up the show’s excitement and stakes.

What’s keeping audiences hooked? 
Kaʻiana’s own Journey of Self Discovery (130). Early in Chief of War, Kaʻiana travels far from the Hawai‘ian Islands, accompanying a group of European sailors across the seas, visiting global trading posts, and learning English; when he discovers that his people are in danger from similar invaders, he finds himself uniquely suited to lead their defense. As he weighs stepping into an important position of Leadership (132), kicking off a major Power Struggle (122), and being forced to take stock of his allies (Trust & Loyalty, 128), the warrior must decide what role he will ultimately play in the struggle for the Islands’ future. The fact that Kaʻiana’s story is very authentically Based on Historical Events (125)–Kaʻiana was indeed a real person, and scenes with his people even use the Ōlelo Hawai‘i native language–makes his journey that much more compelling, and a crucial driver of bingeability.

What type of emotional experience is the show promising? 
A visceral one. A host of intense negative emotions are helping to drive ratings, as they perfectly capture the edge-of-your-seat tension that’s initially pulling viewers into the show: Aggressiveness (128)Anger (128)Fear (124)Surprise (120)Terror (117). Bingeability, on the other hand, is accompanied by a more mixed emotional response, as audiences react to the highs and lows of Kaʻiana’s story: Loathing (128) at the bloodthirsty colonizers, Awe (116) at his heroism, and a sense of acceptance and Submission (126) before the rising winds of great change that cannot be stopped.

How is the show’s social buzz? 
Very strong. The mid-July trailer drop caused an “outstanding”-level spike in online activity (peaking at 143) and early anticipation for the pilot started to build a week later, with our social buzz meter climbing steadily from “average” to “promising” to “outstanding” in advance of the show’s premiere. Apple’s release of the first two episodes on August 1 cemented its buzzworthiness, maxing out our meter (at 160) and remaining there ever since. Viewers are posting and tweeting about the show’s authentic portrayal of the Hawai‘ian people (A Subculture Up Close, 118), their traditions, and their communities (Family Legacy, 116) as well as about chief Kaʻiana’s own story and struggles.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Dexter: Resurrection’ Shows Why a Strong Sequel Lifts Every Chapter of a Series

America’s favorite serial killer is back in Showtime’s newest entry in the mega-successful Dexter franchise. However, rather than a spin-off, this new show continues the very same story begun in the original Dexter, continued through the limited series Dexter: New Blood, and set up in the prequel Dexter: Original SinDexter: Resurrection follows the popular antihero through New York City in pursuit of his missing son as the threat of his past finally starts to catch up.

Here’s what you need to know about Dexter: Resurrection:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Is the same Dexter audience tuning in for this new revival? 
Yes and no. All four of the existing Dexter series show a roughly even gender split (for Resurrection: 47% men / 53% women) and heavily favor viewers 35+ (for Resurrection: 78%). However, the original series premiered back in 2006, meaning that fans watching the pilot live on Showtime are 19 years older now in 2025; thus, the 22% of the Resurrection audience that’s aged <35 today suggests that the franchise has picked up a considerable base of new and younger fans in the years since.

How important is the Dexter brand to the success of Resurrection? 
Extremely. Resurrection picks up shortly after the finale events in the New Blood limited series, in which (spoiler alert!) the titular antihero was shot and seemingly killed. Fans of Dexter Morgan are undoubtedly flocking to this sequel to see how he survived and where his story will go next. The fact that Resurrection is an IP Extension (137) is its #1 overall viewership driver, and the storytelling tools that have become closely associated with the franchise (Dexter’s snarky Voice-Over Narration, 122; serial killer Murder Violence, 124; deeper themes around Father-Child Relationships, 125) are also crucial audience draws.

What’s setting this new Resurrection series apart? 
Dexter’s arc. In Dexter, the character hid in plain sight as part of the Miami PD, maintaining a clean façade to hide his lethal extracurriculars; in New Blood, he hid out of sight in an isolated small town, avoiding anyone who might recognize him from the past. Now, in Resurrection, our favorite killer’s no longer quite so hidden, luridly embracing his antisocial Dark Passenger (Fish Out of Water, 122) in vibrant New York City (NYC Setting, 113), all while Being Hunted (120) by an old Miami coworker who finally knows what he’s capable of. The now-Captain Angel Batista–a mainstay of the original series–at last suspects Dexter of being the notorious Bay Harbor Butcher (Murder Suspect, 125) from all those years ago and is hot on his heels, injecting this series with a larger dose of Anticipation (118) and Terror (116) compared to its predecessors. These new pieces to Dexter’s journey are particularly boosting Resurrection’s ratings and potential longevity.

How is Resurrection’s social buzz? 
Absolutely killing it. The late-May trailer spiked social chatter to the top of our buzz meter (at 160) for several days; online activity shot back up only a month later–an entire two weeks before the show’s premiere–and has stayed up there ever since, with no dips at all in the weeks between new episodes. And Resurrection’s rising tide has indeed lifted all boats, as the other shows in the Dexter canon have also seen major uplifts. Both the original Dexter and New Blood have been sitting steadily at (160) since late May, and Original Sin has been hovering in the “outstanding” buzz range since mid-July. Fans of the franchise are likely comparing and contrasting and discussing earlier plot points, given how intertwined the storylines are across all four series.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Countdown,’ ‘Ballard,’ and ‘Smoke’ Reveal How Procedurals Hook Viewers Beyond the Case

Three gripping new west-coast-set crime thrillers have premiered on streaming outlets in recent weeks, and all three have been racking up views and generating considerable online buzz. Amazon Prime Video’s Countdown and Ballard and Apple TV+’s Smoke all focus on dedicated investigators–two teams in Los Angeles, one in the Pacific Northwest–determined to solve increasingly urgent cases and save lives, whether that means stopping a city-destroying WMD, a long-active serial killer, or a few serial arsonists. However, while all three play in the same genre sandbox, each offers up a very different take on their central criminal investigations thanks to different tones, themes, and character archetypes.

Here’s what you need to know about these three new titles:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

What’s pulling viewers into Countdown? 
A high-octane undercover team. Countdown takes an action-forward approach to its crime-solving, punctuating its many thrilling scenes of Action & Violence (144) with moments of humor to keep the tone light and fun. The series follows a band of covert operatives from different law enforcement agencies all Working Undercover (119) to stop a nuclear bomb from detonating in America’s second largest city. Audiences are tuning in for their breathtaking Heroism (136) and Teamwork (125) as well as the sharp, playful Co-worker Relationships (134) and Unlikely Friendships (115) that develop among the mismatched group.

What’s making Ballard so compelling? 
Solving crimes in a familiar universe. A spin-off of the mega-successful Bosch and also based on a Michael Connelly novel series, Ballard follows LAPD Detective Renée Ballard as she delves into a series of unsolved cold-case murders (Solving A Murder, 130; Death Theme, 120) and uncovers a far-reaching web of police corruption and cover-ups. The show’s ties to Bosch (IP Extension, 146)–the popular titular character even cameos in the trailer (Returning Character, 125)–are its #1 viewership driver, and audiences are leaning into Ballard’s similarly-themed Police Procedural (125) elements and complex, darker tone.

What’s setting Smoke apart? 
Ambiguity, suspicion, and the potential for twists. From author Dennis Lehane, Smoke was inspired by a true-crime podcast and follows a pair of troubled investigators–one a police detective, the other with the fire department–who reluctantly Team Up (131) to stop a pair of serial arsonists (Criminal Investigation, 152; Fighting Crime, 135) before they can kill again. The show’s big hook is its enigmatic arson investigator (Mysterious Character, 117), who falls Under Suspicion (129) and becomes a major suspect in his own case. The possibility that he’s hiding Dark Secrets (130) and putting others’ Lives in Danger (133)–including his police partner–creates heavy tension and suspense and is keeping viewers glued to their seats.

How are these shows doing in terms of online chatter? 
Great. All three immediately rocketed to the top of our social buzz meter (at 160) upon their premieres and held that level consistently for two full weeks post-release. Since then, Countdown and Smoke, both on a weekly roll-out schedule, have seen a bit of a drop between new episodes but have nevertheless stayed in “outstanding”-level territory; Ballard, whose full first season was released all at once, has remained at (160) since its drop, with no variation

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘The Waterfront’ Reveals the Trick to Masking Gritty Drama as Soap

Netflix recently released an addictive, attention-grabbing new series that, more than a month after its premiere, is still going strong, heading the streamer’s top ten list and generating considerable buzz. From the creator of Dawson’s Creek and The Vampire Diaries, this new series straddles the line between gritty crime and soapy melodrama and follows a seemingly affluent and put-together North Carolina fishing family that actually hides treacherous lies and messy dark secrets.

Here’s what you need to know about The Waterfront:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Which of the show’s two genres is most influencing its appeal? 
Moral crime drama. We’re seeing a gender-balanced audience (50% men) of those 30+ (80%)–a much closer match for the world of anti-hero crime thrillers than soapy family melodramas. Shows like Ozark, Yellowstone and Animal Kingdom all maintain a similar gender balance, while series that lean more into tumultuous, twist-filled family relationships (Revenge, Nashville, This Is Us, Bloodline, A Million Little Things, and even the creator’s own Dawson’s Creek and The Vampire Diaries) all appeal more heavily to women.

Are these crime-based elements propelling the show’s ratings? 
Absolutely. The show’s top five ratings drivers all center around the affluent Buckley family’s descent into organized crime (Criminal Organization, 160; Crime Family, 146) as they attempt to save their one-proud empire from spiraling into decay. Outwardly respected business moguls whose family has dominated the North Carolina fishing industry for generations, the current crop of Buckleys will do anything to preserve this at-risk legacy, turning to High Stakes (136) smuggling, Drug Dealing (134), and worse for ever-higher and riskier payouts (Avarice & Greed, 128) as fishing becomes increasingly unreliable as a source of wealth. The Waterfront joins similar gritty crime dramas (e.g. MobLandPeaky Blinders) in leaning on its less-than-legal underworld elements to pull in audiences.

Where does the family drama piece come in? 
It inspires bingeability. While viewers may be tuning in for the Buckleys’ fledgling criminal empire, they’re staying glued to their screens for the family’s interpersonal clashes, toxic melodramas, deep-seated Marital Problems (125), and soapy Family Legacy (112). The secrets of this toughened, hardened clan (Tough Guys, 151) provide plenty of fodder for relationship twists and turns throughout the show’s first season, especially in the wake of their Life Changing Decision (116) to become involved in crime. The binge-driving emotional experience of Surprise (119) is also gripping audiences, who are eager to see the storyline zig and zag.

How is the show’s social buzz? 
Very impressive. For the first four weeks of its release, The Waterfront held a consistent (160) on our social buzz meter, maxing out our top measured level of chatter for a length of time exceeding most comps. While online activity has since dipped very slightly, it’s still hanging out near the top of “outstanding” territory at (150), promising continued buzz for weeks to come. The star-studded crime thriller MobLand saw a similar streak of social virality after its release back in March.

What will help propel The Waterfront into a second season? 
The chance the Buckleys will get caught. Among the show’s many secondary characters is a DEA agent sniffing around the family’s drug smuggling, and, along with the stresses inherent in Working with Family (117) on such an illegal enterprise, the potential for a Criminal Investigation (114) with Emotions Running High (114) will help maintain the suspense and stakes across future seasons.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Nautilus’ Makes a Strong Case for Reinventing IP Instead of Reviving It

AMC recently premiered an exciting new adventure series that has been generating considerable buzz and netting impressive viewership numbers for the network. A reimagining of Jules Verne’s 1870 novel Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, the show creates an origin story for the enigmatic Captain Nemo as an Indian prince-turned-rebel slave-turned-crusading scientist who captures and pilots the Nautilus submersible.

Here’s what you need to know about Nautilus:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Who’s been watching this new aquatic adventure show? 
We’re seeing an audience that leans toward men (55%) and is heavily older, both on linear AMC (90% aged 35+, with the largest demo 55+) and streaming AMC+ (78% aged 30+, with the largest demo 45+). This viewership matches other linear-based historical adventure epics like VikingsBlack SailsInto the BadlandsThe Last Kingdom, and The Librarians: The Next Chapter. (Notably, genre entrants that originate on streaming–Shōgun, Marco Polo–tend to land a bit younger overall.)

What’s the series’ biggest draw? 
Its odd couple pairing. At the heart of the show is the ‘opposites attract’ energy between the mercurial, secretive Nemo and the privileged, stubborn Humility Lucas, a woman forcibly taken aboard after the Nautilus collided with her ship. Though initially adversaries from very different backgrounds, the pair ultimately forges an Unlikely Friendship (145) as their adventures progress, and it’s this element that spurs the most dynamic character growth and propels all four of our key metrics: ratings, bingeability, social buzz, and longevity.

What else is pulling in viewers? 
The crew’s interactions. Nemo and his Nautilus companions (save Humility Lucas) start the show as prisoners of the East India Mercantile Company, sentenced to hard labor constructing the firm’s powerful new submarine. Through a carefully-planned uprising (Rebels, 122), they succeed in taking over the vessel and sail to freedom in the open seas, refashioning what was intended as a war machine into a ship of exploration and scientific discovery. Audiences are tuning in for this motley crew’s compelling Team Dynamics (112) as brothers-in-arms and now deep-water sailors, and to see them clash and cooperate as they take the Nautilus on new adventures. Interestingly, the series’ connection to the famous classic novel does not appear anywhere in its list of top drivers, possibly because nearly all of its characters and storylines were invented fresh for the show.

What’s keeping audiences watching? 
Adventure and suspense. The show’s exhilarating, swashbuckling sense of Outdoor Adventure (122) couples well with the heightened stakes of the crew’s Dangerous Mission (119): to avoid capture and death at the hands of the sinister East India Mercantile Company officers hot on their trail. This overall tone of excitement, helped along by the Action & Violence (119) marking each deep-sea peril and hero-to-villain confrontation, is keeping viewers on the edge of their seats.

What landed best in the show’s native UK and Australia? 
Humility and adventure but not the wider crew. Produced in Britain and filmed Down Under, Nautilus boasts the same overall top driver in these markets as it does in the US: the spark-filled Unlikely Friendship (125 AU; 120 UK) between Nemo and Humility Lucas. The show’s broader sense of Outdoor Adventure (121 AU; 119 UK) is also crucial in driving ratings, bingeability, and social buzz in both markets. However, the Team Dynamics (87 AU; 87 UK) and Rebel (102 AU; 102 UK) status of Nemo and his crewmates that are so important to American audiences are not nearly as interesting to viewers here, who instead seem to prefer a narrower story focus on the two ‘odd couple’ protagonists.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Stick’ Makes a Case for Mentorship as Sports TV’s Secret Weapon

Apple TV+ recently released a quirky new lighthearted sports dramedy that, halfway through its first-season run, continues to top the streamer’s weekly most-watched list and drive plenty of buzz. The show stars Owen Wilson as a washed-up ex-pro golfer who discovers a troubled teen prodigy and attempts to coach him into the big leagues, staking his own future on the boy’s success.

Here’s what you need to know about Stick:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Who’s been tuning in for this likeable new show?
With its golf focus and midlife crisis arc, we’re seeing an audience that’s mostly men (64%) and heavily aged 30+ (71%)–a notably more off-center sweet spot than many other lighter sports-focused dramas. Comparable shows like Ted LassoCobra KaiRunning PointThe GameFriday Night Lights, All American, and Ballers appeal to a somewhat more balanced streaming viewership, both in gender (45-56% men) and age (57-67% aged 30+).

What’s pulling in viewers and driving Stick’s ratings?
Weighty topics handled with a light touch. The two characters at the heart of Stick–disgraced pro-golfer Pryce and sullen teen prodigy Santi–are dealing with fears of abandonment and low self worth thanks to past trauma. Both have Anger Issues (123) as the latter grapples with deep-rooted Teen Angst (133) and the former tries desperately to resuscitate his future (Trying to Save Career, 128), laying an effective foundation for relatable drama and true character development. At the same time, the show’s gently humorous take on their story (Awkward & Funny Moments, 141) lightens the tone and invites audiences into their world.

What’s keeping audiences glued to their screens?
Warm character dynamics. Pryce and Santi are surrounded by caring friends and family (Supportive Relationships, 134) who boost them up as needed, and the unlikely yet genuine Mentorship (119) and Male Friendship (129) that develop between the pair as they butt heads and find common ground is the show’s beating heart. Their relationship is buoyed by an optimistic, feel-good strain of comedy (Feel Good Humor, 122), and it’s the show’s unique brand of inspiring warmth that’s driving bingeability and bringing viewers back throughout the season.

What type of emotional experience are viewers looking for?
A well-rounded one. Stick’s top emotional drivers reflect both the weightiness of its characters’ trauma and the hope of their ultimate success, both in golf and in life. As Pryce and Santi experience a range of very human emotions, from the lows of self-Loathing (134) and lash-out Aggressiveness (134) to the highs of competitive Anticipation (134) and hard-won mutual Trust (134), audiences are right there with them, pulled along by the relatability of their Optimism (110)Sadness (113), and general Apprehension (134) towards life.

Where do the sports themes come in?
They help with longevity. All of the show’s specifically sports-related elements top the list of drivers that will help push Stick to a second season: its insider focus on the golfing world (Sports Focus, 120), its protagonists’ specifically Coach-Athlete Relationship (129), and its centering on a pair of rootworthy Underdogs (137) who are fighting their way to the top. Stick very much falls in line with other sports-based dramas and dramedies in this area, whose long-term story engines also tend to be fed by similar themes.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Ironheart’ Hints at a Quiet Revolution in How We Tell Hero Stories

The number of women superheroes on TV has jumped in the past few years thanks to the broader explosion of comic book and superhero content in general. Heirs to a storied dynasty (Wonder Woman, The Bionic Woman, Xena: Warrior Princess), this most recent crop of female-led titles kicked off with Netflix’s Marvel deal (Jessica Jones), passed through DC’s Arrowverse (Supergirl, Batwoman), and broadened to additional streamers like Hulu and Disney+ (She-HulkMs. Marvel, Echo, Ahsoka). And with last week’s premiere of its newest Marvel series, Disney+ has just introduced another buzzy, compelling heroine into this impressive pantheon.

Here’s what you need to know about Ironheart and other female-led superhero shows:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Do these shows always attract the same viewers? 
No. The age and gender skew of their audiences can vary widely, from mostly men (Ironheart, She-HulkAhsoka) to primarily women (BatwomanSupergirl), and heavily 30+ (EchoJessica Jones) to largely <30 (Ms. Marvel). This variation likely reflects the wide range of tones, subgenres, and violence levels incorporated into these series, each of which has a different appeal. For Ironheart, we’re seeing a viewership that’s 60% men and 58% aged 30+, aligning most closely with fellow Disney+ entry She-Hulk.

Is it important to these shows’ success that their superheroes are women? 
Not like it used to be. For the DC and Marvel series that premiered several years ago, the fact that they were led by powerful heroines rather than much more typical male protagonists was one of their very top viewership drivers (Strong Female Character, 151 – Batwoman (2019); Strong Female Protagonist, 148 – Jessica Jones (2015)). However, as both universes expanded and female superheroes happily became more common–both on TV and in theaters–their gender became less important. The more recent shows in each canon instead pull in viewers based on the nuances of their own specific stories and character development; the fact that they’re helmed by women doesn’t even appear among their key drivers.

What does spur ratings among the more recent female-led series? 
Superhero excitement and relatable characters. As with their male-led counterparts, shows like Ms. Marvel, Echo, She-HulkAhsoka, and Ironheart trade heavily on their Stylized Action & Violence, heightened suspense (Life in Danger, Dangerous Mission), cool and imaginative Superpowers, and broader universe connections (Marvel Universe, Star Wars Universe) to get fans pumped and eager to watch. And underlying this layer of Action and Adventure is a broad base of emotional heart as these characters must navigate Family RelationshipsFamily ConflictEmotional Turmoil, Friendships, and, in one case, Teen Angst, making it easy for viewers to sympathize and connect.

What’s setting Ironheart apart from the other Marvel shows? 
Journey of Self Discovery (160). Though Ironheart is a superhero origin story just like many of its brethren, this version focuses on a frustrated teenage genius eager to be recognized for her skills and put her own stamp on the world, and its unique viewership drivers–beyond the action and Marvel connections–all revolve around her personal growth. The show tracks protagonist Riri, first introduced in the second Black Panther film, as she grapples with Tough Decisions (135), works to Overcome Adversity (126) (lack of funds, MIT expulsion, personal loss), and ultimately rises to the occasion, both emotionally and through her crime-fighting tech advancements (Stepping Up, 124; Bettering Oneself, 128). Riri is also a heroine who, like her idol Iron Man, invents her own superpowered capabilities rather than develops them supernaturally (as in Ms. Marvel, She-HulkEcho, and Jessica Jones).

What’s the buzz potential for these superhero series? 
Extremely high. Thanks to the widespread popularity of their respective universes, these female-led series–just like their male-led counterparts–can spur tremendous chatter online, especially the more recent entries. Whereas ten years ago, shows in this genre took a bit longer to catch on and build word of mouth (e.g. 2015’s Jessica Jones, which didn’t really hit its stride until T+40 days after release), Ms. MarvelEchoShe-Hulk, Ahsoka, and now Ironheart (all released since 2022) immediately maxed out our social buzz meter (at 160) with their premiere and remained there for a number of weeks.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Rapid Insights: ‘Revival’ Unlocks Why Comic Book Horror Is the Genre Blend to Watch

Syfy recently premiered a gripping new supernatural horror noir that’s based on a popular comic series of the same name. The show follows a small Wisconsin town in the aftermath of “Revival Day,” a shocking day in which the recently deceased suddenly came back to life–not as zombies but as themselves, with looks, memories, and personalities intact.

Here’s what you need to know about Revival:

Vault AI uses index scores to describe the impact a given story/theme/element will have on specific KPIs: 
≤79 Disappointing  80-89 Challenging  90-109 Average  110-119 Promising  120+ Outstanding

Who’s tuning in for this intriguing new series? 
We’re seeing an audience that’s mostly women (60%) and heavily aged 35+ (90%)–a profile right in line with other linear series about mysterious supernatural happenings in a small town. Shows like The ReturnedThe Leftovers, ManifestWayward PinesGrimm, and Haven all hit a similar viewership sweet spot (56-65% women / 89-94% aged 35+).

What’s Revival’s biggest draw? 
Its unique spin on Solving A Murder (146). After the dead awaken (Afterlife, 125), small town police officer Dana Cypress (Female Professional, 127) must figure out who killed her younger sister, a “reviver” who has no memory of her own demise. Working with a CDC lab contact to analyze the supernatural evidence (Scientific Method, 125), Dana contends with Murder Suspects (131) both living and undead to uncover what happened and how it might be related to the miraculous “Revival Day.” The show leverages its high-concept set-up to infuse a procedural framework with fresh new layers, inject a sense of the macabre (Death Theme, 130), and bring its original source material to life (Based on a Book, 137), keeping audience glued to their seats and driving both bingeability and longevity.

Why else are viewers tuning in? 
For its unsettling slice of Small Town Life (122)Revival’s isolated setting makes the Mysterious Event (117) at its center that much more unnerving, amplifying the unease of its 4,500 residents as they’re forcibly blockaded from the rest of the world by the CDC. The show’s exploration of the widespread paranoia as well as its focus on Dana’s maladjusted personal life (snarky and resentful, she’s desperate to escape while trying her best as a Single Parent (122)) are helping to boost ratings.

How is the show’s social buzz? 
Really good. The pilot’s premiere on June 12 spurred significant online activity, maxing out our social buzz meter (at 160) for several days. Though chatter dipped a bit in the week between new episodes–a common occurrence for series on a weekly rollout schedule–it nevertheless remained in “promising” range (at 118) before spiking right back up into “outstanding” territory (at 149) with episode two. This pattern suggests a promising hold for the rest of the show’s first season.

What’s appealing to Canadian audiences? 
Dark humor in a small town. Filmed entirely in New Brunswick, Syfy’s Revival is airing simultaneously across the border on CTV Sci-Fi, and Canadian audiences are being pulled in by different elements than their American counterparts. In particular, the show’s Twisted Humor (116 CA) carries much more weight here, especially as it relates to quirky Small Town Life (120 CA) and Dana’s misadventures as a Single Parent (120 CA). At the same time, the whodunnit investigation at the heart of the story (Solving a Murder, 80 CA; Murder Suspect, 93 CA; Scientific Method, 103 CA) is much less compelling.

Introducing Genre DNA™


Redefine your understanding of TV subgenres

Introducing Genre DNA™ – TV subgenres redefined by groundbreaking AI analysis to reveal the true drivers of viewership.

See the insights that others can’t

Genre DNA™ goes beyond traditional TV genre classifications by analyzing over 1,000 scripted and unscripted series on both linear and SVOD platforms from the last 5 years.

Each Vault Genre DNA™ report offers a precise analysis of your chosen TV subgenre, uncovering its unique drivers of viewership.

*Publicly released trailers for series are evaluated using Vault’s algorithms – utilizing our proprietary 120K+ story element database alongside viewership performance and other datasets – to identify unique combinations of stories, themes, characters, and genre elements that will drive success.

Stay in the know

Subscribe to get Rapid Insights delivered to your inbox or follow us on LinkedIn

Past Rapid Insights: Miss one? Check out previous issues here

Processing...
Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.
Subscribe
Sign up with your email address to receive news and updates.
ErrorHere